Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘carry fee’

In a front page story Sunday May 20, 2012, Ted Sickinger of the Oregonian provided a detailed review of private equity valuation concerns.  This portfolio of opaque investments has grown substantially and poses unique risks to Oregonian PERS participants.  In his article, Sickinger notes this analysis is based upon original Parish & Company research.

Although an excellent article, there was still no mention that Oregon PERS does not keep independent records of “carried interest” fees paid to the private equity general partners nor K-1 annual partnership statements summarizing activity.  These private equity firms include Blackstone, KKR and Fortress. The fees cited in the article are for “management” and do not include the carried interest fees which are typically 10 times the annual management fee.

It is indeed remarkable that the Oregon State Treasury does not maintain these independent records.

Here is a link to the story:  Oregon PERS: Private equity investments pose unclear future

Read Full Post »

Note (Not Copyrighted) : This basic post was updated December 10, 2010 given the current debate in Congress over extending the Bush tax cuts and numerous inquires regarding my position in this debate.  The purpose of this post is to highlight that although rates are important, perhaps more important are overall fairness issues associated with two situations in particular.  Put another way, why don’t we all forget about the rates and focus on basic fairness first.  Doing that should allow rates to come down in all brackets.

With the financial reform package now passed, all eyes are on the setting of specific rules regarding its implementation.  And while lobbyists attempt to direct the debate away from where it should be, let’s instead visit the core issue, tax rules.

This rollout of specific rules related to the Volcker Rule and related tax considerations will squarely position Paul Volcker, pictured on the lower left below and current IRS commissioner Doug Shulman, lower right, against Blackstone Group LP’s Steve Schwarzman and other leveraged buyout artists operating under the guise of “private equity.”  Why are tax rules key one might ask, especially if these rules have nothing to do with the debate over carried interest?

(more…)

Read Full Post »